As a child grows up, he tends to act upon less and less of his problems with fists; in fact he is oftentimes more likely to find it reasonable to talk turn out the conflict. Societies tend to behave similarly, individually and as a culture. The contravention between modern and ancient unfeignedism is well illustrated in the pages of history books, one evolved into the other as our (Western) civilization grew and easy took over the world. Parallels can be traced in all major cultures. However, not all cultures began at the same time, so their distribute is not always in sync, which graphicly creates tension. Therefore, rather than affair either side of the Melian dialogue just or unjust, its consequential to understand that both certain concepts are applicable to their time, and what was viewed a certain way in the ancient world result not necessarily conform to todays values.
The Melian debate is indeed a perfect example of cardinal leading groups whose political philosophies collide in a real international relations situation. In a nutshell, Athens are offering melian leaders to submit to them and be left unharmed, merely Melians choose to fight to death for their honor and freedom.
One will note that the Athenians argument is more aggressive and more morally unjust from our point of view. However, this kind of aggressive attitude is what allowed ancient empires to be built, who eventually developed a political, philosophic and scientific base for the modern society that would not be executable with smaller countries that would be too concerned with survival and feuds to in reality progress. Athenian kind of philosophy is a part of natural selection. Although Athens is the apparent the aggressor in this encounter, its important to note that Melian leaders, while supposedly defending justice, are decision making the entire islands fate without consent...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .
No comments:
Post a Comment