Running head NameUniversityCourseTutorDateThe debate on animal examination has remained a controversial one on the public battlefield . Opponents of the practice assert that animals have a feel and frankincense feel pain and happiness . Therefore , just standardized human being demand for life , the right of animals to enjoy their inborn lives should be respected by man . Also claimed is that animals and benevolent beings are different in their genetic makeup as well as in their responsiveness to external stimuli (Alper , 2008 . This has the deductive reasoning that animal test to qualify the dependablety of products developed for clement being is quite unreliable .
Still , given the red-brick technological advancements alternative testing techniques should be employed as failure to do so negate the meaning of scientific developments in the human communityOn the other hand , proponents of animal testing claim that it is the only practical way of ensuring quality and safe products for reality Some proponents assert that the world is structured in a hierarchal manner with man being at the top . Such has the implication of animals being of less esteem and thus can be used by mankind for his own good For the proponents of animal testing therefore , failing to testing scientific products on animals is compromising the dignity of mankind (Shumake Engman , 1993 . Nevertheless , given the fact that animals have a life , they have unalienable right to live their natural lives in good order without harm by mankind . Therefore...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .
No comments:
Post a Comment